Liverpool reject Inter Milan's £21m bid for Curtis Jones, valuing midfielder at £40m
Liverpool have turned down a second offer from Inter Milan for Curtis Jones, with the Serie A champions' £21m bid falling well short of Liverpool's £40m valuation. Jones is out of contract next summer, leaving the club at risk of losing him for free.
Liverpool have rejected Inter Milan’s second bid for Curtis Jones, telling the Serie A champions they do not wish to continue negotiations after the Italian club’s £21m proposal fell far short of the Reds’ £40m valuation of the midfielder.
Inter’s offer of €25m represented their latest attempt to sign the England international, but Liverpool dismissed it as a significant undervaluation. The rejection comes despite Jones entering the final year of his contract at Anfield, meaning Liverpool risk losing him on a free transfer next summer if no deal — either a sale or a renewal — is reached.
Despite that looming deadline, Liverpool have not given up hope that Jones will commit to a new contract and remain on Merseyside. The club’s stance on his price is informed by broader midfield market values: Manchester City have offered over £100m for Elliot Anderson, while Sandro Tonali and Mateus Fernandes are expected to command significantly higher fees than Inter have proposed. Liverpool have also noted that Tottenham paid £52m for Brighton defender Jan Paul van Hecke, who, like Jones, had just one year remaining on his deal.
Inter’s interest in Jones dates back to the end of the January transfer window. The pursuit gained a personal dimension when Liverpool’s Italy international Federico Chiesa recently revealed that the 24-year-old had been asking him about life at the Milan club — a disclosure that underlined Jones’s own curiosity about a potential move.
Jones made 49 appearances for Liverpool last season but started only 18 Premier League matches, and finished the campaign filling in at right-back under Arne Slot rather than in his natural midfield role. His versatility and age make him an attractive target, but Liverpool’s firm stance signals they will not accept a cut-price exit for a player they continue to value highly.
Read also
-
Football ·Kolo Muani back at PSG, his future still uncertain ahead of summer transfer
-
Football ·Hasselbaink blames England players' mentality, not Tuchel, for Argentina World Cup exit
-
Football ·MetLife smog row exposes four stadiums better suited to host World Cup final
-
Football ·Santos set for debut as United name 25-man squad to face Wrexham in Helsinki
-
Football ·Zidane inherits disappointing Dembélé World Cup as priority issue
-
Football ·Atletico CEO insists no fee will prise Julian Alvarez away, leaving Man City windfall in doubt