Russell reveals he pushed for Mercedes upgrade split before Bahrain failure
George Russell has dismissed suggestions that Mercedes' decision to run split aerodynamic packages in Singapore signals a crisis, revealing he had already lobbied the team to revert to an older specification before his engine failure in Malaysia.
George Russell has pushed back firmly against the narrative that Mercedes are in disarray over their aerodynamic upgrades, revealing at the Marina Bay Street Circuit that the decision to revert to an older specification was his own idea — formed before his power unit failed in the closing laps of the Malaysian Grand Prix.
When Mercedes announced they would run split packages in Singapore, with Andrea Kimi Antonelli continuing on the new updates while Russell returned to a baseline setup, the paddock widely interpreted the move as a panicked, reactive measure. Russell says that reading is entirely wrong.
“Well, actually, I instigated the conversation prior to the race on Sunday,” Russell confirmed during his media availability in Singapore.
The timing made the call straightforward. Already facing a mandatory engine penalty for Singapore, Russell had little to lose by using the race as a controlled test of the older package. “So when the failure happened, it was kind of a no-brainer because we were kind of 50/50 about it pre-race,” he explained. “And I was more in favour to do it, and I was even pre-race, whereas now it just, yeah, it is a total no-brainer.”
Russell also pushed back on the suggestion that the team’s new aerodynamic package is fundamentally flawed. He pointed to the extreme performance variance the team experienced with an unchanged car earlier in the season as evidence that circuit characteristics, not the upgrade itself, are responsible for the pace deficit seen in Malaysia.
“There’s no signs telling us the upgrade was not working,” Russell said. “We know the car we had in Baku was the same car as we had in Budapest and Zandvoort. And Baku we were on pole by eight tenths and in Budapest, you know, we were four tenths off the pace.”
With a swing of over a full second possible between circuits on identical machinery, Russell is confident the brutal Sepang surface is the primary culprit. “We’re pretty confident it’s a Malaysia specific,” he added.
The split-package approach in Singapore therefore serves a dual purpose: it gives Mercedes a direct back-to-back data comparison between the two specifications at a street circuit, while Russell’s grid penalty already limits his realistic points ceiling for the weekend. How Antonelli fares on the newer package relative to Russell’s baseline will give the team clearer direction on where the development programme stands heading into the remainder of the season.
Read also
-
Formula 1 ·Russell reveals missing front wing may have sabotaged Mercedes' Malaysia upgrade disaster
-
Formula 1 ·Wolff dismisses 'brainless' favouritism claims as Antonelli leads Russell by 84 points
-
Formula 1 ·Wolff dismisses 'brainless' favouritism claims as Antonelli leads Russell by 84 points
-
Formula 1 ·Racing Bulls to decide Lawson or Tsolov for 2027 seat within weeks, says Permane
-
Formula 1 ·Leclerc admits Ferrari's 2026 software punishes his aggressive qualifying instincts
-
Formula 1 ·Hadjar says cooling vests should be banned as F1 drivers remain split ahead of Singapore
Malta W